Your numbers
Marketing spend means everything — ads, agencies, consultants, marketing payroll. Founders who count only ad spend underestimate their real customer cost by 10–20×.
Why can't I just type in my CAC?
Because the flattering number is almost always wrong. What an ad platform says one customer cost — its CPA, or cost per acquisition — broke as a source of truth after the 2021 privacy changes: a platform's claim about which customers its ads produced (attribution) no longer separates them from the ones who would have found you anyway. The only reliable customer cost is blended CAC: everything you spend to get customers, divided by all the customers you got. This tool computes it that way on purpose.
⛔ Fix unit economics before scaling.
Your customer lifetime value is below what a customer costs you. Spending more on marketing makes this worse, not better — every new customer loses money that never comes back. Capital doesn't fix negative unit economics; either the value proposition or the marketing execution needs to change first.
LTV
—
lifetime gross profit per customer
Blended CAC
—
true cost per new customer
LTV : CAC
—
value vs. cost
Your CAC against the ceiling
Why is LTV the ceiling?
If getting a customer costs more than that customer will ever return in gross profit, growth is just a machine for converting cash into losses. So LTV is the hard ceiling on CAC — and because your numbers are estimates and markets move, you operate with a target comfortably below it. Scale hard while CAC sits at or under target; pull back as it drifts toward the ceiling; never scale past it.
How the numbers connect
How payback is estimated
Why does this tool show two LTV numbers for a marketplace?
Because the marketplace world quotes LTV two different ways, and they differ by roughly the inverse of your take rate — 4–5× for a ~20% take. The GMV convention (common in marketplace investor decks) takes everything a buyer spends through your platform and applies your gross margin: in our starter model, $317 of first-year GMV × 77% → $244 LTV, which is 2.4× the paid CAC in that model. The take-based number multiplies by your take rate first, because sellers keep the rest: the same buyer leaves your platform only ~$55 of gross profit.
How to use each: benchmark and pitch with the GMV convention — that's what the 2.4×/3.4× starter-model figures and most public marketplace comparisons are calibrated to, and it's fine as long as you label it. Budget and plan cash with the take-based number — hiring plans, runway, and CAC budgets paid for with GMV-convention LTV run out of money 4–5× faster than the spreadsheet says.
And when you're reading someone else's number (a deck, a benchmark post, another founder): the first question is always "is that LTV on GMV or on your take?" An impressive LTV:CAC can quietly be a GMV-convention figure compared against a take-based cost. This tool always shows you both.